Otto Retzer ist Schauspieler und Regisseur. 123 Ergebnisse zu Nina Munz: Whitefield, kostenlose Person-Info bei Personsuche Yasni.de, alle Infos zum Namen im Internet And as contended by Nancy, the chancellor's decree does not affect the corporation in any way. A court order did not restrain her. Although directed by the chancellor at the February hearing to refrain from incurring any additional debts, Mrs. Retzer later gave her maid a $529.00 ring as a present, and on April 25, 1988, because she was depressed, she purchased for herself a jewelry pin costing $3,800. More specifically, this doctrine generally applies to two broad categories of cases: (1) Those "in which a third party seeks to hold shareholders individually liable" for corporate debts; and (2) Those in which "a shareholder utilizes a corporation to perform indirectly acts which the shareholder could not legally perform as an individual." VI, 659) He called the pastor to calm her down. These rights and obligations, both at initiation of the marriage and its dissolution, are insured by the State and courts acting as "third party" to the marital contract. The restaurants were incorporated as Retzer & Retzer ("R & R"), and all equipment used in the restaurants was leased from Retco, another corporation of the Retzers'. Thus, to help the chancellor determine an accurate assessment of the Retzers' financial status, another hearing was held after which the following opinion was rendered: Vol. The Retzers were apparently generous to Mrs. Retzer's mother, Mrs. Boyette, the Retzers paying for her cosmetic surgery costing several thousands of dollars. Mike and Nancy Retzer were married in Louisiana on December 19, 1970. As above noted, the total income of them both from the corporation for the year 1986 was $256,227.30. 874, 877, 27 So. 1985)). Shirley Jane Retzler, age 80, Carmel, CA 93923 View Full Report. Mike's primary support for his contention that the child-support award is "too high" i.e., a comparison between the amount of the award and the salaries received by various public officials is unpersuasive in light of all the evidence and relevant law. See, e.g., Harrell v. Harrell, 231 So. Then, at the end of the year they would split what was left. It lists $44,200 cash assets. And "Mike, himself, told the Court that any money spent on the children was not wasted." Anna A Retzer was born circa 1919, at birth place, North Dakota, to Christian Retzer, Jr and Freidericka Retzer. Her possession of them did not cause him any concern. The daughter is now a teenager. Seinen Geburtstag feierte … Mrs. Retzer filed an answer denying his ground for divorce, and a complaint for separate support and maintenance, custody of the children, an accounting, and an award of one-half of his assets. 857, 858, 56 So. 2d 1155, 1157 (Miss. Beacham v. Beacham, 383 So. Cf. Zu viele Bilder ausgewählt. The chancellor opined that "[a]s to child support, it is clear that these parties and their children have been accustomed to a very high standard of living and that with his income the father clearly has a duty to aid in their support." 50, 179 So. Were the chancellor to have strictly complied with the statutory guideline, Mike would have been ordered to pay substantially more. At most, all or a portion of her teacher's salary of from $10,000-$14,000 went into the original 1971 investment, which Mr. Retzer hotly disputed. He then awarded her $88,000 per year alimony ($7,333.33 per month), with the provision that any sum paid by the corporation to her in dividends would be deducted from the alimony due her. He had two watches costing several thousand dollars each, and upon cross-examination when Mrs. Retzer's counsel asked him if he would take $4,000 for the one he had on, Mr. Retzer took it off and sold it to him. Zu Ehren von Sepp Krätz, dem diesjährigen vom Schlemmer Atlas gekürten „Gastronom des Jahres 2011“, fand am 14. He removed and photostated some and replaced them. A daughter, Kathryn Reed Retzer, was born to their marriage July 1, 1976. Code Ann. September 1945 in Lölling, Österreich. While our cases in which we have awarded the wife alimony when her husband was granted the divorce do not specifically make a distinction between the amount such a wife is entitled to as compared with a wife granted a divorce when her husband was at fault, the facts and our holding indicate the purpose of the award was not to afford the wrongdoer wife alimony in accordance with her standard of living, but rather alimony sufficient to prevent her from being in desperate need. 2d 802 (Miss. Mrs. Retzer did meet the second factor it was a long marriage. Nancy finally adds that the "best way to understand the weakness of Mike's position is to assume that the [chancellor] denied any monthly payments ... and left Mike in charge of R & R." "Mike would have control indefinitely of Nancy's income producing assets and keep all profits realized on Nancy's property without paying Nancy anything.". 1985), and McRae v. McRae, 381 So. 2d at 438. According to Mr. Retzer, McDonald's corporation required more than an investor for a local franchise. Currently, Shirley lives in Winfield, PA. Background details that you might want to know about Shirley include: ethnicity is Caucasian, whose political affiliation is currently a registered Republican; and religious views are listed as Christian. Nach der standesamtlichen Trauung am Freitag, heirateten Ralph Siegel und seine Schweizer Frau Laura gestern Samstag kirchlich. However, we did not increase the chancery court's alimony award to Mrs. Wood of $10,000 payable in $500 monthly installments without interest, which we would have been compelled to hold was shockingly inadequate had she been granted a divorce from her husband. See, Winfield v. Winfield, 203 Miss. As evinced in the preceding subsection, the chancellor extensively analyzed the evidence and applicable law. at 858, 56 So. She admitted spending over $2,700 on furnishings, of which $814 was charged to the corporation. Two of our decisions might suggest otherwise, Jordan v. Jordan, 510 So. She contributed no property, income or services in the acquisition of these restaurants. Wie reich ist Otto Retzer? Start; Über uns. See Appellant's Brief at 1 (citing cases). Except for what has been noted, the entire management and operation of the business was by Mr. Retzer. [1] They had assignations at a selected house on Highway 82 and at Lake Ferguson in Washington County, in Louisiana, and in Arkansas. AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND RENDERED IN PART. 105, 43 So. 2d 1120, 1123 (Miss. 1989). Mrs. Retzer's certified public accountant William Baird had unlimited access to Mr. Retzer's and corporate records. I, at 61-62 (The chancellor noted: "Exhibit 11 to the written stipulations filed with this Court list[s] the living expenses of Mrs. Retzer ... and Mr. Retzer makes no objection to being required to continue paying the ... expenses that Exhibit 11 indicates he is paying.") She "broke valuable porcelain" and a "Picasso plate." Because of tax credits and a lower unemployment rate, Retco also employed personnel for the restaurants. 1967) (on habitual cruel and inhuman treatment); Gatlin v. Gatlin, 248 Miss. During the hearings, Mike contended that, because he was granted a divorce on the grounds of adultery, Nancy should receive only that which she "legally" owns and nothing more. He testified approximately $25,000 of this sum were his savings, and another $20,000 a loan from his parents. Our society has always sought to foster "the establishment and continuance of the family unit and the mutual obligations and rights of its members." 1987); Tutor v. Tutor, 494 So. Anna had 4 siblings: Marie M Retzer and 3 other siblings . ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., DAN M. LEE, P.J., and PITTMAN, J., concur. 2d at 506 ("We have a long line of cases ... recognizing that, where the parties have been married for a number of years, where the wife is in need of financial support, the chancery court, being sensitive to the equities of the case before it, has authority to direct payment of alimony even though wrongful conduct on the part of the wife was found sufficient to grant the divorce to the husband.") With the exception of Mrs. Retzer's charge that Mr. Retzer had propositioned the young lady in Greenwood, the only evidence in the record that Mr. Retzer behaved in any way improperly from the time of their reconciliation in 1979 until they separated in July, 1987, was in the summer of 1982. A planned assignation between Mrs. Retzer and the attorney in an Atlanta hotel in the summer of 1981 was suspected and discovered by Mr. Retzer. 1988) (holding that chancellors are accorded broad discretion due to their "peculiar opportunity to sense the equities of the situation" before them); Cheatham v. Cheatham, 537 So. The decree of the chancery court is accordingly reversed and rendered on the $275,000 lump sum award to Mrs. Retzer, and affirmed on the award of custody of the children. 165, 84 So. This corporation has no other purpose except through legal ownership of five McDonald's restaurants to create wealth for and furnish income to Mr. Retzer and Mrs. Retzer. According to him, his problems with his wife were not restricted to extra-marital relations. Also, at one time she attempted to help settle a strike. With less than $30,000 in 1971, the business had grown and flourished, and they were quite wealthy in 1988. Baurecht in Marburg. In Carraway, 212 Miss. 643, 165 So. Otto Retzers Vater war Landwirt und seine Mutter Postbotin. 2d 435, 438 (Miss. The two had code telephone signals whereby planned meetings could be held. In other words, before the divorce Nancy owned 27% (approximately $1.1 million) of the Retzers' net worth (approximately $5.1 million according to the "Balance Sheet"). Freigegeben / keine Freigabe erforderlich. In these cases it could fairly be stated that but for her actual assistance to him in his business or profession he would not have accumulated such wealth, an excellent example being Jones v. Jones, 532 So. She never purchased any stocks or bonds, or had a savings account. Nancy adds that "Mike really did not want custody of the children" and that he simply "wanted to use [them] as a pawn to negotiate with Nancy" the monetary aspects of the divorce. Since it has failed to maintain the approval of a majority of Justices, it is now submitted in its entirety as a dissent. 2d 294, 296 (1961) (on habitual cruel and inhuman treatment); Hibner v. Hibner, 217 Miss. (Vol. See e.g., Carr v. Carr, 480 So. The chancellor's innovative decision-making is affirmed. Finden Sie perfekte Stock-Fotos zum Thema Ingrid Kraus sowie redaktionelle Newsbilder von Getty Images. Geboren wurde Otto Werner Retzer am 13. She had recently had cancer surgery. He simply notes that: "If affirmed this will overrule Skinner ... and all prior decisions upholding the integrity of the corporate entity.". This means that they received nearly $200,000 above and beyond that received from R & R. Based upon the Retzers' substantial income and the finding that "it is clear that these parties and their children have been accustomed to a very high standard of living," the chancellor "ordered and directed" Mike "to pay Nancy ... the sum of ... $1,250.00 ... per month per child ... and to provide or maintain ... medical insurance" as well as the costs of the children's "private school tuition for the school they now attend. 2d 1044 (Miss. She stated her reason for doing so was that it took some time for them to be effective, and she took them in anticipation of her divorce. Mrs. Retzer did not meet the third and fourth factors because she will have a separate income or estate and financial security without any lump sum award. This Court like the chancellor is not convinced by Mike's adamant stance that an adulteress deserves nothing while an adulterer deserves all. In fact, it has been held that he holds the same duty as a managing partner owes the other partner in the management of partnership *595 affairs. As above noted, Mrs. Retzer did not teach after 1972, and took no part in the business. See, Delaney v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 278 Or. 1970). Because of her spending this did not work out (Vol. Auszeichnungen; Stimmen der Alumni; Partner und Unterstützer Mike seems to conveniently forget that he too committed acts of adultery and wears no "white hat." März 1934 in Sledge im Bundesstaat Mississippi geboren. The Retzers separated that day. Mrs. Retzer took draperies from their residence, and then had a headboard cover and bedspread and pillow shams of matching material sewed for the house. If the burden becomes unduly oppressive for either, the chancery court is not without power to give relief, even to appointing a receivership for the corporation or dissolving it. Pride wurde am 18. She also testified that he was the only man she had ever loved, and that she wanted to resume the marriage. 2d 366, 367 (Miss. 2d 514, 515 (Miss. Shirley Retzer 420 Myra Rd Skinner, 509 So. We therefore affirm the amount of monthly income Mrs. Retzer is to receive, but amend the judgment to reflect this as an obligation of Mr. Retzer to see that she receives this sum from his management of the corporation. 37 Shirley Retzer pictures. 817 (1900). Compare with Tedford, 437 So. Upon Mrs. Retzer's promise never to stray again, he paid off the overdraft. The chancellor's conclusion seems conservative. The chancellor's determination concerning custody of the children, who have been living with their mother now for over three years, is affirmed. Mike adds that, "[n]o matter how rich the parents, there are reasonable limits to what young children can use and consume.". Also, attorney's fees and accountant's fee were awarded her. He produced a picture of the interior of the car they occupied, showing bucket front seats with a console in the middle. If so, it would have amounted to somewhere between $10,000 and $14,000. There was a division of two residences, with Mrs. Retzer being required to relinquish her interest in one, and he the other, and each thereafter to assume all indebtednesses on them. 2d 503, 506 (Miss. [1] Notably, Mike had prepared a false and misleading financial statement which reflected a net worth of only $1.5 million. The couple moved to Greenville, where Mrs. Retzer taught in the public school system. Michael L. Retzer was granted a divorce from Nancy B. Retzer in the chancery court of Washington County on the ground of adultery. As to her overspending, again the chancellor equated Mr. Retzer's extravagance with hers. The Retzers' restaurant business was so successful that they opened six more McDonald's in other towns during the 13 years that followed. Mr. Retzer denied ever having made any sexual advance to the young lady in Greenwood, *584 and denied making any agreement for adultery with Mrs. Retzer. [5] One outstanding fact from this record is that throughout their turbulent marriage, both Mr. and Mrs. Retzer have had able legal counsel. Mr. Retzer denied this. He has no lump sum alimony obligation from these acquisitions during a period when she was committing adultery and living a profligate life-style. Mr. Retzer kept diaries of his trips with his children. This leaves Mike with 65% (approximately $3.3 million). For the years 1980-87 the corporation paid each the following salaries and bonuses: *585 Also for 1980-86 their joint income tax returns showed the following: Mr. Retzer's testimony as to her uncontrolled spending and incurring debts was essentially uncontradicted. 509 So. Recently-enacted statutory law provides a more specific guideline. Known Locations: Carmel CA, 93923, Palos Verdes Estates CA 90274 Possible Relatives: Nicole S Retzler, Robert Edgar Retzler, Todd P Retzler. She also told him that she had contemplated suicide and drove in front of a truck, but at the last minute lost her nerve and drove into the field. [6] Indeed, at trial Mrs. Retzer testified Mr. Retzer made no complaint as to her profligacy until they went to court. Merideth, Jr., Greenville, for appellee. 2d at 449. He began by noting that, "with the exception of testimony indicating immoral conduct ... on the part of both parents, most evidence indicated that both ... are suitable and dedicated parents." [2] Mike's obligation continues until the children are "emancipated or until further [court] order. Another hearing was conducted August 19, following which the chancellor rendered an opinion September 7, 1988. at 781, 161 So. Now, through ownership of ten more shares than she, Mr. Retzer has control of the management of Retzer and Retzer. Nancy retained custody of the two children, Kathryn (14 years old) and Michael Jr. (8 years old), after Mike left her in July, 1987. 1 (1913) (on desertion). [1] Mrs. Retzer testified it resumed the last of 1983 or early 1984. She was caught in 1981 and forgiven, after promising it would end. Finally, in January, 1988, she borrowed another $5,000 from Sunburst. The child support, while liberal, will of necessity come from the most part from the business Mr. and Mrs. Retzer own in almost equal shares, and we see no reason to reverse this award. He concluded that their combined net worth was $4,100,000, with Mr. Retzer holding about $3,000,000 of the assets. Mrs. Retzer testified that until their separation, Mr. Retzer had never complained seriously about her spending, that he had teased her about it. 2d 1120, 1121 (Miss. She bought $1,600 worth of intoxicating beverages from a local liquor store. In dem Film Rudi, benimm dich! 2d 503, 507 (Miss. Join Facebook to connect with Shirley Retz and others you may know. Mrs. Retzer wrote checks during the same period from her account totaling $22,539.73, of which $16,952.23 was for herself, $2,525 went into "Fantasy," and $2,862.50 was disbursed to Mrs. Trudy Boyette, Mrs. Retzer's mother. Following the separation, Mrs. Retzer had two more engagements with the local boy friend. At that time they were in something of a financial bind, and in order to pay these bills, Mr. Retzer agreed to go on her note at a bank for $27,000. The error of the chancellor, as above noted, was in decreeing that Mr. Retzer pay Mrs. Retzer $88,000 per year, or $7,333.33 per month, as alimony. 2d 884, 885 (1946). Der Sänger fiel ins Koma. According to Mr. Retzer, from the beginning Mrs. Retzer was continually in "financial distress." Mrs. Retzer's only reason or excuse for her assignations was her testimony at trial that she and Mr. Retzer made a deal in 1982 for them both to "discreetly" carry on extra-marital intercourse. 2d 294, 296 (1964). § 43-19-101 (1990 Supp.) Mr. Retzer eventually hired a private investigator, and in 1986 when he saw the boy friend at a social function, he told him not to talk to "Nancy" again, and the boy friend agreed. Susanne Lothar starb am Mittwoch mit nur 51 Jahren. They both testified he was attempting to advise and assist her in business matters. When the checks bounced, Mrs. Retzer came to the office and "threw a fit." He also ordered and directed her not to increase her indebtedness prior to trial. He will not be acting at arm's length, but as trustee over her shares. The following was initially prepared as the majority opinion. From the beginning of their marriage, she was an exorbitant spender. Pennsylvania had the highest population of Retzer families in 1840. Mrs. Retzer owns 49.8% of the shares in Retzer and Retzer, the corporate owner of five commercially successful McDonald's restaurants, which should afford her a substantial income. Also, they rented a house to Mrs. Boyette for $375 a month, a modest rental for the investment. As a consequence we were not called upon to address the specific question of whether or not the wife was entitled to any alimony. The majority opinion in the case sub judice reflects regression from society's (and this Court's) evolving, enlightened view. 1984)); but see Appellant's Brief at 28-29 (where Mike seems to suggest, erroneously, that this Court's standard of review is: "whether there has been a material change of circumstances") (citing and quoting Smith v. Todd, 464 So. However, the $44,200 cash assets listed could have included a savings account. In Tedford v. Dempsey, this Court delineated a general guideline which a chancellor should consider before entering a child support decree: 437 So. He did admit to receiving the telephone call from the young man, who he said was drunk, and according to Mr. Retzer, he told him never to call him again. Mr. Wood, on the other hand, had an annual income of $40,000 of which $8,400 was non-taxable. Nach einer Kellnerlehre wurde er Discjockey und Wasserskilehrer, bis ihn 1970 der Chef der Lisa Film, Karl Spiehs, entdeckte, als Assistenten engagierte und zunächst mit kleinen Arbeiten rund um seinen Stab betraute. 2d at 1302; Clark, 293 So. Am bekanntesten ist er für Ein Schloß am Wörthersee (1990), Her mit den kleinen Schweinchen (1984) und Das Traumhotel (2004). She and the businessman denied any improper conduct.